Why localization of tactical communications is crucial in NATO operations preparation
In modern warfare, tactical communication is a core infrastructure that goes beyond voice communication, connecting location information, target data, video, and command and control information in real time. In particular, in NATO operations involving multinational forces, interoperability, security, maintenance sustainability, and supply chain resilience are as important as the performance of communication equipment.
NATO defines interoperability as the ability of allied forces to act together consistently and effectively to achieve tactical, operational, and strategic objectives. Therefore, tactical communication localization is not simply local assembly, but should be viewed as a system integration process that connects national operating environments with NATO standards.
NATO Interoperability is not simply about using the same radio
According to NATO, not all countries need to use the same equipment to ensure interoperability. Even with different equipment, it is necessary to enable connection, communication, data exchange, and service exchange, and to follow common procedures and standards.
The NATO Allied Digital Strategy, released in 2026, explicitly stated that national digital capabilities assigned to the Supreme Allied Commander or deployed within NATO defense plans must meet agreed-upon interoperability standards and joint mission networking criteria. This means that the introduction of tactical radios, for example, should prioritize how they integrate within the overall command and control network, rather than focusing solely on the specifications of individual equipment.
Elements to verify during the localization process
- Network integration: Data connection between the existing command and control system, the combat management system, and sensor and weapon platforms.
- Frequency operation: Settings and interference management are adjusted to match the frequency policies and radio environment of each country.
- Security Controls: Incorporates national cryptographic systems, key management, user authentication, and cybersecurity requirements.
- Testing and Certification: Interoperability verification, taking into account NATO standards and the joint mission networking environment.
- Life cycle support: This includes on-site maintenance, parts procurement, software updates, and the establishment of a training system.
Rafael BNET: Software-Defined Tactical Communications
Rafael’s BNET is a family of tactical communication products that combines broadband IP-based software-defined radio and mobile ad hoc network technology. It is designed to enable mobile command centers, vehicles, aircraft, and troops to form a network without relying on fixed relay infrastructure.
According to the aviation-grade BNET-AR data released by Rafael, this equipment primarily supports a frequency range of 30-512 MHz and offers L-band and S-band as optional specifications. The total network capacity of the BNET waveform is 100 Mbps or higher, and the maximum upload speed per user is specified as 10 Mbps.
The software architecture complies with SCA 2.2.2, allowing for centralized management of waveforms and functions. However, these product specifications do not directly imply operational approval within the NATO network. Actual deployment requires separate national security certifications and system integration testing.
Local Engineering: A Case Study of DND Digital in Germany
The German defense company Dynamit Nobel Defence’s DND Digital is positioning its BNET software-defined radio platform as the foundation for its tactical communications business. According to the company’s description, DND Digital develops and manufactures related digital solutions in Germany, and is building tactical network capabilities targeting the European market.
This structure allows local companies to participate in production, integration, testing, technical documentation management, and follow-up support, unlike the method of importing finished products. It also makes it relatively easier to integrate with vehicles, command and control software, and cryptographic equipment used by the local military.
The key factor is the scope of the technology being transferred. The practical value of localization depends on whether only assembly rights are granted, whether local engineers can modify waveforms and interfaces, or whether they can independently perform software updates and failure analysis.
Local production: The intersection with NATO defense industry policy
The revised defense production action plan, released by NATO in 2025, outlined key objectives including expanding industrial capabilities, protecting supply chains, and promoting interoperability and standardization. It also included plans to expand joint design, joint development, joint production, and joint maintenance in the long term.
Localization in the field of tactical communications aligns with this approach. By establishing equipment production and maintenance infrastructure within the user country or allied nations, access to spare parts and technical personnel can be improved during crisis situations, and operational disruptions caused by interruptions to external supply chains can be minimized.
Local engineering provides a foundation that allows the country to independently manage network configuration, software architecture, and security policies. At the same time, by dividing roles between the manufacturer and local companies, user requirements can be more quickly incorporated into the product improvement process.
Conditions to consider in tactical communication localization contracts
Local sourcing agreements cannot be evaluated solely based on the establishment of production facilities or the percentage of locally sourced components. If the military intends to operate a system independently for an extended period, it must also consider lifecycle support conditions, including technical documentation, testing equipment, training, and software licenses.
- The scope of components and modules that can be produced and repaired locally.
- Source code, application programming interfaces, and the level of access to software development tools.
- Authority for integration with national cryptographic equipment and existing tactical data systems.
- Technical authority required for adding waveforms and changing frequency policies.
- The contract includes provisions for the supply of spare parts, the correction of defects, and the provision of security updates.
- Interoperability test plan for execution during NATO and multinational coalition exercises.
Ultimately, the goal of localizing tactical communication systems for NATO operations is not simply to increase the rate of domestic production. The key is to establish a communication and maintenance infrastructure that allows a nation to maintain control from peacetime while also connecting to the network of allied forces.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is tactical communication localization?
This process involves not only assembling the radios locally, but also integrating the equipment to match the specific frequencies, encryption systems, command and control software, and operating procedures of each country. It also ensures that the equipment can be maintained and upgraded locally.
Do the locally produced equipment automatically meet NATO standards?
No. The production location and NATO interoperability are separate issues. In order to be deployed in actual joint operations, the system must undergo interface configuration and security authentication that comply with relevant standards, as well as network interconnection testing.
What kind of tactical communication system is Rafael BNET?
BNET is a family of software-defined radio products that supports broadband IP communication and mobile ad-hoc networks. It is designed to exchange not only voice data, but also location information, video, and command and control data between mobile power sources.
What is the most important aspect of technology transfer?
It is necessary to verify the scope of local production, software modification authority, waveform and interface management, failure analysis, technical documentation, test equipment, and training provision. Having only assembly authority is not sufficient to secure independent operational capabilities.
How does tactical communication localization contribute to supply chain stability?
If local maintenance personnel, spare parts inventory, production facilities, and testing equipment are secured, it becomes easier to maintain equipment operating rates even if overseas supply is delayed. The response time required for security updates and emergency improvements can also be reduced.
